Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Truth of Britain

  
  1. #11
    Forgive Darkness is offline Corporal
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    19
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Enough said there
    Well I will run up to the local Blockbuster and see if they have that in the store anywhere. But also are there any more recent movies dealing with the Battle of Britain?

  2. #12
    Swan is offline Corporal
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    21
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Just how many air raids were lead against Germany by the British?

  3. #13
    17pounder is offline Corporal
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    12
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    you are maybe forgetting the royal navy.if the german barges came across the channel,the navy over 120 ships strong,would have sallied forth and destroyed those german river barges big time.imagineH.M.S Warspite spewing out 15in shells.17pdr.

  4. #14
    brianw is offline Sergeant
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Bridgend, Mid Glam.
    Posts
    64
    Downloads
    2
    Uploads
    0
    There were some fundamental errors of judgement made by the German high command, failures in intelligence, mistakes by aircrews and too much reliance on dogma for Germany to have ever staged a major invasion.

    The errors of judgment were due largely to failures in intelligence, with German fighter pilots and reconnaissance for whatever reason over-claiming the amount of damage caused to RAF airfields and aircraft destroyed, however the German order of battle was placing almost intolerable pressure of Fighter Command.

    They also failed to appreciate the set up and functioning of “Chain Home”, believing that the RDF stations on the south and east coast were similar to their own early radar installations which were used primarily for watching seaborne traffic in the English Channel. Sustained pressure on these installations could have blinded Fighter Command almost permanently.

    Attacks were diverted from Chain Home in favour of destroying the RAF on the ground, if not the aircraft in the air, then the fighter aerodromes, and had the pressure been sustained for a week or two longer, who’s to say whether the RAF would have succumbed.

    Legend has it that one German bomber was unsure of its location and having failed to find their target decided to jettison their bomb load, (un)fortunately on London; leading to Churchill being so enraged that he raised the moratorium on the bombing of German cities and ordered an immediate reprisal attack on Berlin. Hitler then ordered than English cities especially London should also be bombed; which became “The Blitz”.

    Switching the Luftwaffe effort from attacks on RAF airfields to raids on London gave Fighter Command the valuable breathing space and time to re-arm and re-organise.
    And so, on September 15th 1940 the Battle of Britain was won, but it was as Wellington said after the Battle of Waterloo “A damned close run thing”.

    But what if?

    Had the Luftwaffe destroyed the RAF in south east England and the invasion actually happened.

    The first thing to remember is that Fighter Command was split into Groups and there is little doubt that Dowding would not have thrown every aircraft and pilot into the fray; he would have held some in reserve further north ready for some counter action.
    And then there were the ground defences of southern England which while on the surface seemed a little makeshift were quite formidable with numerous stop lines at intervals between the coast and Whitehall.

    Back in the 1970s the Royal Military Academy enlisted the help of many of the German and British staffs in order to test the actual Operation Sealion battle plans and they found that even though German troops would have been landed and started to break out from their landing points, the problems with the landing barges, supply lines and re-enforcements would have resulted in the occupation lasting between three days and a week.

    Unlike the “Overlord” landings four years later, where the allies had planned for and designed equipment for specific tasks such as the Higgins boat landing craft, Mulberry harbours, PLUTO and an overwhelming force of numbers, Operation Sealion would seem to have been an ill conceived and half baked plan which was doomed to failure.

    But that’s the benefit of hindsight.

  5. #15
    jasmor58 is offline Corporal
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    21
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    like Kelly, I do not quite know what to make of this! From where did FD get this idea?
    Jasmor58

  6. #16
    Stalin's Avatar
    Stalin is offline Second Lieutenant
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    258
    Downloads
    4
    Uploads
    0
    What ever the reason the BEF got home makes good reading.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197