![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Battle of The Pacific Battle of The Pacific Forum |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
||||
|
I remember reading something about this debating Percival's early and easy surrender to the Japanese, the debate was about whether he should have taken more defensive actions and at least should have taken a fight to them!It end with a conclussion he did the right thing as he was under equipped to fight the local villages never mind the Japanese army.. Something along these lines anyway ..
![]() Nice post Dave.. |
|
||||
|
Percival was in a hopeless situation I feel. Had he not surrendered then the cost would've been much greater in lives lost. However you do have to consider that most of the prisoners taken were used as Slave Labour on the construction of the Burma - Thailand Railway where many did not survive the brutality of the Japanese during it's construction.
|
|
|||
|
The British were helpless in the face of Japanese assault. When they return to accept Japanese surrender in 1945, they knew that they were no longer Singapore's colonial masters; in short, the Brits have lost all their authority when they lost Singapore to the Japanese. The Singapore Chinese, having put up strong resistance suffered the most during the Japanese occupation. Who can forget the infamous sook-ching campaign against the Chinese?
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
![]() |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0 War44 |
![]() |